Publications-All about estates

Individual pension plans revisited (again) - What about pension transfers?

Steven Frye May 7, 2019

When a member of an employer sponsored pension plan ceases employment, the member may receive a lump sum payment for the commuted value of their pension rights, exposing that member to a significant tax bill, as only a limited amount of the payment can be transferred to an RRSP.

There exists the possibility of using the pension payout to fund an IPP. Under the right circumstances this may permit the full commuted value (the full payment) to be transferred to the IPP. I said the right circumstances because, based on my reading of some of the current literature around this topic, there are many complexities arising from the requirements under the Income Tax Act and the relevant pension standards legislation to permit such a transfer.

It appears the strategy is possible only where the individual secures new employment as an employer must sponsor the pension plan. The IPP’s primary purpose must be to provide periodic pension payment to individuals in respect of their services as employees.

The recent Federal budget proposed to prohibit IPPs’ from providing retirement benefits in respect of past years of employment that were pensionable service under a defined benefit plan of an employer other than the IPP’s participating employer or its predecessor employer. Any assets including the transfer of any assets (e.g. Lump sum payments) from a former employer’s defined benefit plan to an IPP that related to benefits provided in respect of prohibited service would be considered a non-qualifying transfer that is required to be included in the income of the individual for income tax purposes.

When I first read about the possibility of the transfers, the collective thought was these transfers would attract unwelcome scrutiny of the Canada Revenue Agency (“CRA”)if the new employer was not acting at arm’s length with the individual ( i.e. the incorporated small business owner I was referring to in my last blog on the subject of IPPs’). With the recent Federal Budget proposals, I am now surmising that the CRA can do more than just scrutinize.


As featured on All About Estates Blog where Baker Tilly WM Partner, Steven Frye, is a regular contributor. 

Related content

Business advisory services Private enterprise Tax advisory Private sector consulting
Sean Grant-Young May 21, 2025
Tax advisory Automotive Construction Medical professionals
Sean Grant-Young May 14, 2025
Podcast Business advisory services Cybersecurity solutions Digital technology and risk
Francesca Loreto Sarah Netley May 8, 2025
Alert Advisory
Heather Suttie May 8, 2025
Alert Advisory
Leon Sacks May 1, 2025
Transaction services Private enterprise Construction Manufacturing
Kevin Shaw Tom Hamilton-Piercy Apr 24, 2025
Alert Advisory
Jordan Furlong Apr 23, 2025
Alert Advisory
Keith Eckler Apr 17, 2025
Business advisory services Audit and accounting Indirect tax Tax advisory
Sean Grant-Young Apr 8, 2025
Audit and accounting Private enterprise Tax advisory Private sector consulting
Sean Grant-Young Apr 7, 2025
Solutions within reach
Wherever you need us.
Connect now